all
img
/
txt
/
flash
offtopic
/
lounge
5
Example!
Bulletin Boards
Overboard
Imageboard
Textboard
Flashboard
Off-Topic
Lounge
List 2
Link 5
Link 6
Link 7
List 3
Link 8
Link 9
[
Home
] [
Overboard
] [
Catalog
] [
Search
] [
Thread list
] [
Inbox
] [
Write PM
] [
Admin
]
Off-Topic@CGI
it's the place to be!
[
Return
]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject
Post
Comment
File
Animated GIF
Password
(for deletion, 8 chars max)
Allowed file types are: gif, jpg, jpeg, png, bmp, swf, webm, mp4
Maximum file size allowed is 9000 KB.
Images greater than 200 * 200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
3
unique users in the last 10 minutes (including lurkers)
Switch form position
|
BBCode reference
Read the
rules
before you post.
Read
our FAQ
for any questions.
Modify this by editing $config['ModuleSettings']['ADD_INFO'] in globalconfig.php
2025/05/12
-
I blot'd
2025/05/12
-
Moar blotter
2025/01/30
-
I R TEH BLOTTER
[
Show all
]
congratz on setting up the board!
File:
2025-01-10-015954_1024x768_scrot.png
(93 KB, 1024x768)
My personal tech support... I summon thee...
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)04:59:21
No.
129899
+
I moved to Arch Linux from Windows XP because I realized all of this old Windows nostalgia/aesthetics fad is just shallow and stupid, but I can't make my system look good. To be more specific, I'm having trouble with fonts. On windows, the fonts were always sharp. After some research I realized this may have something to do with bitmap fonts being used instead of outline fonts, but I'm not sure. On every distro I've used the fonts were always fuzzy and ugly. The font pack I installed was gnu-free-fonts, but I'm not sure this has something to do with anything. Would installing a different package and removing this one sort things out? Is there some configuration somewhere I have to tweak? How do you make your linux machine look nice and sharp?
Marked for deletion (Old)
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)05:14:38
No.
129900
+
File:
Screenshot 2025-01-10 001310.png
(142 KB, 1919x1079)
>I moved to Arch Linux from Windows XP because I realized all of this old Windows nostalgia/aesthetics fad is just shallow and stupid
Seriously? You moved to Windows XP just for the aesthetics? I have like almost the same functionality and theme and I didn't need to move to an ancient operating system for it.
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)05:49:06
No.
129901
+
File:
Font-hinting-example.png
(13 KB, 387x668)
>On every distro I've used the fonts were always fuzzy and ugly
What you're looking for is "font hinting", which is where the metrics of each character are slightly distorted so that they're more aligned with the pixel grid, making them appear sharper
L00nix generally does a crappy job of it, but there are usually options where you can set how weak/strong the font hinting is
>all of this old Windows nostalgia/aesthetics fad is just shallow and stupid
Nobody in their right mind is suggesting that anyone should daily drive old versions of Windows (although you technically can) - it should just be for nostalgia, entertainment, or compatibility purposes
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)07:45:20
No.
129914
+
>>129900
why would anyone use google chrome instead of chromium or better yet, ungoogled-chromium
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)07:52:57
No.
129915
+
File:
palemoon.jpg
(26 KB, 474x474)
WHY WOULD ANYONE USE A FAGGOT BROWSER LIKE CHROMIUM OR ___FOX. YOU KNOW WHAT TEH BEST BROWSER IS?!?!?!
PALE MOON! PALE MOON! PALE MOON!
IT IS UNRIVALED IN UNBLOATNESS AND COMPATIBILITY(except for new web3.0 because thats is for FAGGGGGGGGGG0TZ)
PALEMOON FTW! LOSERS WILL CALL IT "fail moon" BUT THEY PROBABLY DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT A INTERNET IS.
PAAAAAAAALLLE MOOOOOOOOON!!!!!!!!!11!!11!
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)07:56:05
No.
129916
+
>>129914
It's actually just hacked LibreWolf with a theme, I stopped using that shit years ago
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)12:08:52
No.
129929
+
>>129915
It has no good adblockers.
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)16:54:29
No.
129944
+
palemoon is old and shit, its missing vital improvement updates so some sites u visit will just shit the bed for no reason (some pale moon user says that happens for nashi) just use firefox, i never used llbrewolf.
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)17:39:25
No.
129947
+
File:
desktop.jpg
(343 KB, 1600x540)
>>129900
Seconded. I'm on Windows 10.
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)18:19:16
No.
129952
+
♫ Pale moon, you saw me browsing alone
Without an ad I could block
Without a vid that would load ♪
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)18:26:59
No.
129953
+
>>129952
WINRAR!!!
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)18:58:10
No.
129957
+
File:
1337.jpg
(23 KB, 326x315)
>some pale moon user says that happens for nashi
UH OH!
H8R ALERT! H8R ALERT!
I BET THIS USER IS ATE UP WITH NORTH KOREAN SPYWAREZ INSTALLED BY HIS BROWSER. ANY PALE MOON USAR WOULD KNOW THAT ADS DON'T AFFECT US FOR THE SCRIPTS OF THE AD WON'T RUN WITH OUR 1337 TECH. FOR YOUR INFORMATION LOSAR, NASHI RUNS A
BLOAT
SOFTWARE DESIGNED FOR YOUR GOVERMENT SPYWARE SERCH ENGINEZ.
YOU'RE JUST JEALOOUS U HAV 2 LIVE IN A WERLD OF PHP AND JS WHILE I LIVE IN A
PARADISE OF CGI AND PERL!!1!!ONE!!!111!11!一!1百十一!!!!!11!
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)20:54:06
No.
129972
+
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Font
Maybe try a different font.
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/10(Fri)23:32:53
No.
129980
+
>>129900
Not *just* because of the aesthetics. Windows XP obviously has less bloat and spyware than Windows 7 and up.
>>129901
But I want them without anti-aliasing at all. On windows XP/7 none of the fonts were anti-aliased.
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/11(Sat)00:04:48
No.
129985
+
>But I want them without anti-aliasing at all. On windows XP/7 none of the fonts were anti-aliased.
Both XP and 7 had font anti-aliasing, but on XP it's off by default
Linux usually has the ability to disable font anti-aliasing somewhere, but most fonts are not designed with that in mind, and some programs override the system setting (this is true of Windows as well)
Read this:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Font_configuration
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/14(Tue)03:47:45
No.
130294
+
File:
yes-street-fighter-2118684481.gif
(253 KB, 220x150)
If anyone is interested in how I found my way out of this predicament. I copied the fonts from my windows XP installation into /usr/share/fonts and used this configuration:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Font_configuration/Examples/No_anti-aliasing
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/14(Tue)03:54:09
No.
130295
+
>>129900
>>129947
also I hope you know you guys are posers
>>
0
Anonymous
2025/01/14(Tue)04:55:36
No.
130297
+
>>129900
windowblinds?
>>
0
Mystery_Mleczik_Z
◆3HgciFmEWk
2025/01/18(Sat)03:03:28
No.
130689
+
sudo pacman -S noto-fonts && sudo pacman -S noto-fonts-cjk && sudo pacman -S noto-fonts-emoji && sudo pacman -S noto-fonts-extra
Depending on the tools you have you can also just download them from browser!
Delete post: [
File only
]
Password: